Do you hear yourself? - 8/12/2025

Last year the murder rate in Washington D.C. was nearly double the rate in Bogota and triple the rate in Mexico City. Because they hate Trump more than they hate violent crime, the excuses and resistance to Trump stepping in is astounding. "So far in 2025 the numbers are down!" In my imagination, I keep hearing Margaret Brennan's interview with J.D. Vance, Margaret arguing that the Venezuelan gangs are only controlling a couple of apartment complexes in Colorado. J.D. said something like, "Do you hear yourself, Margaret?" Every excuse I hear for D.C., I have to admit that I can't think of anything better than, "Do you hear yourself?" "Crime is down in D.C., it's barely double the murder rate in Mexico City this year! Barely Double!"

The progressive left has dealing with crime all wrong. As they do with economic issues, they focus on outcomes. Too many in jail. Too many convictions. Unfair policing policies and unjust prosecutions.

That stuff ain't working. Why? Because it doesn't work. All I hear is resistance, excuses, and bullshit explanations. Yes, bullshit explanations. If you're one of them parroting these same bullshit explanation now that, heaven forbid, Trump is stepping in, I have to ask, "Do you hear yourself?"

Trump - Russia Can't Die, If It Does, Your Lies Will Die, too - 8/10/2025

I'm going to try not to look stuff up, so, if you fact check me and I'm just 'almost right' about something I have to say this morning, I can live with that. This bullshit Russia collusion narrative is 9 years old now, and I didn't keep notes or a database.

Trump and Russia. The narrative they can't allow to die.

First of all, I remember Wiki Leaks. They released emails from John Podesta. This was back in 2016 I think. Could have been 2017, but my recollection is that it was prior to the Trump vs. Clinton election. Do you remember what was in there? Like the one, important thing that undermines the entire Russia collusion narrative? I want to say the email was May of 2016 as my mind dwells on it for a bit. There was an email in which, before ANY of the Trump - Russia bullshit started out there, Hillary says words to the effect of "we'll tie him to Russia and beat him that way". It was the Clinton Campaign who tried (pretty successfully) to frame Trump for colluding with Russia.

Now a Senator, Adam Schiff claimed repeatedly he saw the evidence. Was he gullible, or was he part of the operation to frame Trump?

Nearly every single thing that happened since then, as far as Democrat and Deep State attacks on Trump, goes back to that fact, that point in time. Of course, if you watch CNN or ABC or read the New York Times, they're not EVER going to connect the dots back to that point in time, so I had to do it for them.

Hey, while I'm here, who said this: "First we f*** Flynn, then we f*** Trump?"

OK, for extra credit: what two people exchanged these text messages: "Trump's never going to be elected President, right?" "No, he won't. We'll stop it." I may be paraphrasing here, but I haven't forgotten. Have you?

Classified documents the Deep State worked hard to keep hidden from you, documents that were declassified by DNI Tulsi Gabbard, also show that the Russia collusion narrative is deeply rooted in Hillary Clinton's campaign. It was foisted on you because she had to do something to distract you from her classified e-mail problems.

But, hey. I still see Trump Russia colluded thrown out there by gullible sheep. What is most often happening there is that Russian meddling in the election and the notion of Trump colluding with them are conflated and treated as being the same thing. They're not. Yes, Paul Manafort went to jail. He sold some internal polling info, I think that's what he sold, to a Russian. Trump fired him. He went to jail for it, too.

Oh, yeah. The Steel dossier. Let's get some facts straight. Fusion GPS is a firm in D.C. that does what's called 'opposition research.' In 2015 a GOP candidate, I think it was Ted Cruz, hired them to do background on Trump. They did, and sometime later, after Cruz dropped out, the Clinton campaign contracted with them. Read this next bit very carefully. Again, as a disclaimer, if I have an improperly crossed 't' or an un-dotted 'i', sorry. This is from a now 68 year old memory.

The Clinton campaign commissioned, in payments rendered via a lawyer named Marc Elias (still very active in the political dirty tricks game) from the lawfirm Perkins-Coie, Fusion GPS for the Steel Dossier. Fusion had in it's employ a former CIA type, she may actually have been NSA or other three-letter agency, but I think CIA, named Nellie Orr. Nellie's husband was or is, no idea their current status, a guy named Bruce Orr, a DOJ lawyer connected to Crossfire Hurricane. I think it is greater than 50/50 odds that Nellie wrote the dossier, or at least parts of it. But, even if it was Christopher Steele himself or one of his British colleagues, that either means that the Clinton Campaign paid a political dirty tricks operation in D.C. to phony up the dossier, or that she paid a foreign entity, under Steele, to do it. Either way, Hillary Clinton was and is dirty.

Why all this today? Because all this is absolutely bedrock foundational to everything that happened to Trump in his candidacy and first term. Every single thing. If you pull these cards from the first level of the house of cards, it all falls to pieces. These facts, not alone, there are others, but these facts condemn the U.S. press, the three letter agencies, and the Clinton Campaign. Democrats attacking Tulsi Gabbard, Sen. Mark Warner, for example, one among many, know the cards are being toppled. 9 years in, there are folks who have made a career bolstering these lies. There are reporters who won Pulitzer Prizes for journalism for spreading them. None of them can go back now and correct the record, lest the house of cards fall directly on them.

Then there's the average, run of the mill, Trump Deranged Democrat. You've sucked so much milk from these lying teats for so long, you wouldn't recognize or believe the truth, regardless. Mark Warner and his ilk know this. They like keeping you stupid and ill-informed. They like keeping your Trump Derangement at a fever high level, all the better to keep you from seeing whose dirty tricks these actually were, and to keep you from seeing whose fingers were in the cookie jar.

Rhetorical questions, in closing. Would people who foisted Trump-Russia collusion lies to try to win in 2016 also lie to us about Hunter's laptop in 2020? Would they cheat in an election by shoving in thousands and thousands of absentee ballots in the middle of the night? Would they taint tallies in electronic voting machines? I betcha if you said no to all three of those, that you still believe that Trump colluded with the Russians. You also probably stopped reading this blog post a long, long time ago.

I wanted to talk also about how facilitating illegal immigration was an intentional political play on part of Democrats, but I've run out of rant for now. Maybe another day.

Change the F***ing Channel, Dumba$$! - 8/2/2025

Change the f***ing channel, Dumba$$!

Fmr CIA Director John Brennan is a compulsive and professional liar. And a criminal.

If your news channel of choice still uses former CIA Director John Brennan for analysis and commentary, are you a Trump deranged willing dupe, or are you just stupid? Watching John Brennan and believing him only makes sense to me for someone who hates Trump so badly that you want to cling to any and every negative thing said or written about him, regardless truth, regardless of source. There's plenty to legitimately criticize Trump about, but John Brennan isn't the guy you want informing you... or maybe he is.

If you watched a different channel, you would know that John Brennan was the one who overruled his analysts in order to help create a Russia collusion controversy surrounding Trump. The collusion narrative was a product of Hillary Clinton and the Clinton campaign. High ranking members of the Obama Administration took on the mission of advancing that lie with the specific goal of damaging Trump and taking attention off of Hillary Clinton's criminality in the classified emails from an unsecured and illegal  server in the bathroom scandal. It worked... of a while.

But then Trump got re-elected. Wasn't supposed to happen. They even tried to assassinate him to stop him. Failed. He got in office and appointed Tulsi Gabbard ad Director of National Intelligence. If you are listening to people on your news channel of choice who refer to DNI Gabbard as "a Russian asset", maybe you ought to change the f***ing channel, dumba$$!

Tulsi Gabbard isn't a Russian asset you f***ing morons!

Here's a brief list of news outlets I wouldn't trust to tell the true story of the 2016-present day Russia collusion story:

• New York Times, Washington Post
• Politico
• Slate, Vox, HuffPo, Daily Kos, etc.
• ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, NPR
• CNN, MSNBC

If you don't understand by now that every one of those I listed, and dozens that I didn't, are invested in the narrative, and in most cases were directly involved partners in crime, aka: co-conspirators, with the Clinton Campaign, Brennan and the rest of the Deep State, I suggest you change the f***ing channel, dumba$$

I can't believe the lack of curiosity from those of you on the left with all the revelations from the stunning ongoing declassification of documents. If you think John Brennan coming on CNN or MSNBC and telling you "nothing to see here" means there's nothing to see, are you really that  f***ing stupid or are you just a fellow traveler in Brennan's, rolling along in the same Deep State caravan of lies? All I can say is:

Change the f***ing channel, Dumba$$! 

4 reasons, 3 reasons, 2 reasons - 7/23/2025

Lemme give you 4 reasons President Barack Obama won't be successfully prosecuted for any of the relevations in the Russiagate scandal. He's neck deep in it, but if you think you're going to see him arrested, convicted, and or confined, forget about it.

1. He has broadly defined presidential immunity. The same standard of immunity that SCOTUS declared Trump had/has will apply to Obama.

2. Statute of limitations will be expired on many individual charges that might otherwise be brought.

3. Obama will be way beyond untouchable by any convened Washington D.C. grand jury.

4. Washington D.C. Federal Judges are about as likely to find Obama guilty of something as D.C. grand juries would be to charge him. As in not.

 So forget about it.

Now, here are 3 reasons Brennan, Comey, Clapper, Clinton, etc. won't be successfully prosecuted:

1. The statute of limitations will also shield these scumbags from liability for their own criminal actions.

2. Washington D.C. courts will also excuse almost any crime, even if proven, if it was done in the name of stopping Trump.

3. Washington D.C. Federal Judges are leftist activists and won't give the prosecutors of their fellow travelers much chance for success.

And finally, 2 reasons NOT to release the so-called Epstein files.

1. Because not every person whose name is going to come out is guilty of any crime. We ought not "guilt by association" innocent people in the interest of nailing some guilty ones.

2. Releasing the names may weaken cases. I'd rather see them build cases and successfully prosecute a few of these scumbags than to have the whole bunch of them get away with it because releasing these names compromised their rights.

I realize there's blood in the water and some of you sharks wanna eat, but I think I'm telling you right. 

The Tulsi Bombshells. Incomiing!!! - 7/21/2025

This morning, I've got stuff going on, so just a few notes on the DNI Tulsi Gabbard bombshells of the weekend (DNI stands for Director of National Intelligence, if you didn't already know):

 

1. Not a bit of it, except the specific documents that she has that back up the rest of the story, is new to me. Devin Nunes, Kash Patel, and Dan Bongino knew all this, too. But half the country get your news from lying propagandists. The Trump - Leslie Stahl 60 Minutes interview comes to mind, one medias suitcase of lies on a Queen Mary steamship full of them. You could look it up: Leslie Stahl and Donald Trump 60 Minutes. Go for it.

 

It may be new to you, but it ain't new.

2. If you do have even half a an open mind, find a good, clean copy of the Epoch Times Spygate foldout I'm posting here, above. It's all in there.

 

3. If you still think HRC, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, are/were all "good guys," you know, people who live and act with honesty, integrity, decency, and always in the interest of righteousness, you're hopelessly biased and or brainwashed. You are a huge part of the problem. I am sorry to say that, but it's true. If you had had an open mind 7, 8, 9 years ago, this wouldn't be a big story now.

 

4. Barack Obama won't ever be found guilty by a judge or jury in D.C. Forget it. It'll be hard enough to get the legal system in far left D.C. to get any of the other corrupt officals/conspirators. Obama? Forget it. Untouchable in D.C. Fantasize about something else, that ain't happening.

 

5. I wish I could say all this was unprecedented, but after all these scumbags did to try to stop Trump from being elected in 2016, again in 2020, and yet again in 2024, it's more like "about damned time" than unprecedented. Payback for having their agents rifle through Melania's panty drawer looking for documents that were in open dispute and the subject to ongoing discussions and negotiation? It is coming.

Spoiler: they were in Melania's panty drawer looking for evidence of what Tulsi has made public this weekend, NOT the documents they said publicly that they were after. There is supposedly a binder Trump kept that had all the bad stuff in it. Candidly, I don't know that there really is or was a binder, but I can easily, very easily, buy the theory that they were looking for the kinds of emails and correspondence Tulsi is making public.

 

6. Remember when evil Hillary called Tulsi Gabbard "a Russian asset"? Remember when the corrupt U.S. intelligence apparatus put her on a terrorist watch list causing her, a sitting member of the U.S. House of Representatives and an officer in the U.S. Army to get special security attention, aka harassment, when she flew? Seems like they f***ed with the wrong girl, at least it seems like that to me.

 

7. There is more to follow. DNI Gabbard says more documents are forthcoming. She says a number of whistleblowers are finally coming forward to tell their story. Somebody had to know something. Bring it on.

 

8. If you still think the Deep State is just a MAGA conspiracy theory, you're stupid. Wake the f*** up. TDS is no excuse for stupidity.

The Real MAGA Beef About the Epstein List - 7/15/2025

First off, I want to make it clear, I have supported and do support Trump since 2016, my preference for DeSantis notwithstanding. I don't call myself MAGA. I just don't. I do like what MAGA stands for, but I don't subscribe to any movement top to bottom, side to side. The world is complicated, sometimes I have my own thoughts and I'm not in perfect alignment with the mainstream.

Suicide or suicided?

Now, to the reason I'm writing tonight: Why is MAGA in an uproar over failure to release "the Epstein list"? The angry mob is calling out anyone who might not agree to the list's release as "protecting pedos", but at the heart of it, that's not the real issue. If not that, then what is?

The real issue is that Jeffrey Epstein is widely believed to have been a tool for intelligence organizations, in the U.S. and or abroad, secretly gathering information on his guests' lewd and immoral behaviors, which was then used to blackmail those same individuals here in the U.S. and overseas, to do the bidding of intelligence agencies. Whether doing so for Israel or the U.S., or both, that's what many believe. It's the root of people not believing "Epstein didn't kill himself," for example.

The theory is underscored by seeing how many of our politicians so often seem compromised in some way into making statements or voting in ways contrary to what would seem to be in good sense and in good conscience. All the dirt Epstein reportedly gathered, it is believed, is used to force politicians to play along or be ruined. Most believe, as I do, that our 3-letter agencies, the valor and commitment of many individuals within them notwithstanding, have evolved to be evil and corrupt, presuming to collectively know better than we do what's best and or what's right of our country.

Many believe our 3-letter agencies meddled in the 2016 and 2020 elections, meddled with Trump's first term massively, and had a large and corrupt role in things like Jan 6th and the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping. Certainaly there is also suspicion about their role in either one or both of the Trump assassination attempts. (JFK/RFK anybody?) You can discount all of that if you want. That's your choice. All I am doing here is to point out in large measure, why MAGA is livid about the failure to disclose the list. Personally, I can see a good number of reasons they might not want to, but I'm not here to argue for or against, just to dig in to the root frustration.

There is one major flaw here. Yes, the people on the list are bad guys: pedos, etc. But they're not THE bad guys. They're the ones who were blackmailed, but NOT the blackmailers. Maybe, just maybe, the reason we're not seeing the list is because they're trying to flip a blackmailed ex-Epstein Island visitor to tell who it is/was blackmailing them to try and make a case against it. Is that what it is? I don't know. Maybe.

Regardless, MAGA feels we've been screwed by the system, particularly rich and powerful people in and out of government, and for them this list is bloody red meat. MAGA wants its due. They're hungry for payback. They want to eat. I can't blame them. 

And fuck the pedos, anyway,

Butler PA, a Year Later - 7/13/2025

 

"Fight, fight, fight!"

A year ago today, an assassin on a rooftop nearby to a Trump rally attempted to assassinate President Trump. A few brief thoughts:

Reports now that the Secret Service had intelligence suggestion Trump's life was in danger, but did NOT alert the agents responsible for security at the event. I want to dig in right here. How could they NOT notify the security team? I start with Trump Derangement Syndrome. All parties involved in the Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Secret Service in D.C. were Biden Admin and Establishment types. You can't convince me otherwise. They saw Trump's rallies as a circus sideshow. A distraction. A waste of resources, time, effort, money, etc. Like, who has ever had this kind of a traveling sideshow and expected us to protect the head clown? For real.

Do I think they were part of a conspiracy to assassinate Trump? It more likely they were not than were so. I do think there was some measure of coverup. I don't exactly know why, but we do know that kid's body was cremated way too fast and I saw, within days, that roof being washed clean. Those two things, alone, insert doubt into the whole story. Do they prove anything? No. But they're goddamned suspicious as hell. If you asked me, do I believe it is an absolute certainty that there was NOT a conspiracy, I would say, no, there is now way it can be totally ruled out. After every corrupt thing that they did to try to stop him prior to, during, and after his first term, to say it is completely out of the question would be preposterous.

Let's look who was running the show: Secretary of Homeland Security "the border is secure" Alejandro Mayorkas, the single most contemptible member of the Biden Administration (my opinion, I know there are certainly others who some dislike even more), Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle, a BIden loyalist who proved to be in way over her head, and Deputy and then Director Ronald Rowe, who couldn't possibly have show himself to be a bigger asshole than he did in the aftermath. There isn't a single one of them I would trust to ensure Trump's well-being.

Will we ever know the full story? Probably not. You would think we would know every single thing about the assassin. Why don't we? Remember the nonsense about not being able to get into his phone(s)? Something stinks. It could be a simple matter of them covering up their own incompetence. It could be something worse. It seems like some transparency would have been enlightening. How could we ever expect that from the same people who said the border was secure and that Joe Biden was mentally competent?